Q and A ABC 5th April comments

Did everyone see Q and A with Keven Rudd as guest ? April 5th 2011.
KR's comments and banter could have been scripted right out of a stage play complete with people's questions on a prompt sheet.

In order to understand how the scenario works you have to understand what went on in the Labor Government at the time all the false and misleading data on climate change, was first announced.

This is important, so try to follow me here. I will make it a script from a stage play so you can piece together what goes on in the minds of politicians with total disregard for their duty of responsibility to the voters who put them there in the first place.

First we have the Labor Government in the form of a caucus, or round table of misfits with the aim of staying in power as long as possible for THEIR benefit; no matter what the consequence to the Australian Voter or indeed, the long term consequences to our quality of life. Will call this lot 'G'. References to 'G' will be post noted with unnamed parties within the 'G' like 'G-1' 'G-2'

Next we have Keven Rudd, the person of interest on Q and A. Just call him 'K'

when the first Bull shit regarding human caused climate change was announced, the Labor party embraced this willingly because it achieved an alternative agenda more readily than anything they could come up with. To wit – how to squeeze more taxes out of the Australian taxpayer and lend credibility to doing so. Every scheme they came up with either failed; because it was badly planned, or cost more money and effort than the supposed benefit to the public it was supposed to endow. Money was disappearing fast through inefficiency, incompetence by ministers who knew next to jack shit about the portfolios they were in charge of, and jobs for the boys.

Here was a scenario that had world backing, at the time, and would enable the Labor Government to impose a new 'consumption' tax without calling it such.

'G' – this is great. Scientists have said human C02 emission’s are causing dangerous climate change around the world. Since we can't increase the GST without getting the boot [ cause we need the money; we're going broke ], we can now come up with some method of extracting money from the Taxpayer in the supposed effort to do our bit and reduce emissions.

'G-1' – But won't we have to really reduce C02 levels by using this tax ?

'G' – well, yes and no. We can do what governments always do and be SEEN to be doing something; sort of token schemes and some emission’s will be reduced. We can use the obvious surplus to boost our stash and pay off all the debt we owe through past idiotic schemes.

'G-2' – wait a minute, at this time a great deal of money comes from industry that obviously puts out as lot of C02; like coal production.

'G' – we can get around that in the form of credits and compensation payments; but will thrash that out later. As for now, we can go to the public with genuine concern for the planet and sincere interest in Australia's well being in the long term through sustainable growth and prosperity – with liberty and justice for all. Ha Ha Ha.

Please note, the term 'sustainable growth' is an absolute nonsense.

Now it was revealed through IMPERICAL DATA that C02 emissions had nothing to do with climate change and the whole hoo-ha was a plot to achieve various alternative agenda's. You can find all this from the NET.

'G' – now we are in real trouble because we KNOW that this climate change fiasco is pure bull shit so we have have no alternative but to do several things.
First – we need this tax, so we have to convince people that there is descent ion around the world about climate change causes.

Second – we cannot do an about face on C02 emissions because this will decimate our credibility completely. WE know it's all bull shit but the public are sceptical so we'll use this to our advantage.

Third: - we have blotted departments with ministers [ jobs for the boys and girls ] whose job it now is to oversea climate change policy and direction. We can't throw them out of a job – they know too much. We don't want a 'wikileaks' scenario at this time.

Now Keven comes in to this debate.

'K' – I don’t think this climate change fiasco will hold water but I'll go along with it because I'm prime minister and my jobs on the line too. The arguments you lot put up seem sensible in the light of the condition of Labor at the moment.

Keven later has a change of heart and opposes every effort to impose the tax.
At this stage, the caucus knows that Keven may blow the whistle on the whole plot so he's given the boot as PM in favour of JG.

'G' – Kev; this is for your own good but don't get bitter or panic. You will get the job of foreign minister if you keep mum about our plans.

Now on Q and A. 'K' ingratiates him self in several clever ways.

First he openly admits he made a mistake in opposing the ETS and Carbon tax. This makes him a good Joe in the eyes of the public. This does several things for 'G'. It validates their pushing this bull shit to the bitter end even if the public KNOWS its all bull shit anyway. 'K' doesn't believe a word he is saying but it keeps him in a job for now; besides, when the whole thing blows up [ and it will eventually ]he's in a neutral corner [ finally ] and can now plead to the lesser charge of 'I was fooled just like the public, after all, I'm no scientist'.
Very clever Kev.

His apparent admittance he made a mistake also gives the Labor party some hope in credibility and that they did the right thing by replacing him. Notice he also qualified his position as being BETTER than Prime Minister. A silent signal to the party that he is really happy to be in a job of both worth and more importantly – NEUTRALITY to party politics. He is now just a go between in world affairs concerning climate change, he does not take a real active part in policy making – he just enforces it on the world stage. Hee hee hee.

And I thought Batty Beattie was a smart cookie. Peter, your a piker compared to Federal labour caucus.

Julia, on the other hand, also is aware that C02 emission’s is BS but being the FIRST women PM , she refuses herself the luxury of being wrong. She knows she will be out on her arse come next election. In actual fact; Keven has laid the initial ground work for continuing in politics no matter what the consequences of labour stuff ups, hell he might even go independent in the future. Keven can't afford being out of a job as there is limit opportunities to STAY in a high position anywhere in the government. Julie, on the other hand, knows she will be booted as PM at elections, BUT still has other directions to follow, she might even score a foreign ministry position. It's all about keeping you job no matter what the cost to Australia. Stuff the public, just get more money from them and play dice with the proceeds.


We'll sum it up with some obvious statements.
Keven knows that a carbon tax is all BS.

He knows that saying he was wrong in opposing it, keeps everyone happy.

He knows when the shit hits the fan, he'll get splattered with a small amount compared to the Labor Government and especially certain ministers like Penny Wong. Sorry penny, your definitely Wong.
Jeff Combett has been proven on talk back radio, to be a boob of the first order. If Jeff said the sky was Blue, I'd have to go outside and verify it.

Julia PM knows the carbon tax is BS but what choice does she have ?.

Admit she's lied about everything in the past and kill her political career for eternity ? No, the only thing left is to push the carbon tax BS and exit gracefully as PM at election time, thus preserving her character as a dedicated believer and true blue Aussie.

Maybe in the future when she writes her memoirs, she will admit how she pushed the BS knowing it WAS BS. I might not be alive to see it, though.

To conclude: Tony knows it's all bull shit [ C02 and climate change ]but unfortunately, he doesn't quite know how to tell it to the public in a language they understand; despite having all the Empirical data he needs. I have never once heard him mention 'Consensus is NOT Empirical Data' Nor has he made any reference to scientists like Professor Bob Carter, or Dennis Jensen – who IS a parliamentarian. Tony; have a LOOOOONG press conference to clear the air. If necessary, have Professor Bob Carter as Guest speaker. Forget the ABC, their motive is purely financial as they too get their funding by pushing this C02 emission BS.