VOTING LABOR ??? YOU STILL DON’T GET IT, DO YOU ??.
Unlike the USA, you DON’T vote for a President, you vote for a PARTY; and it’s the party that runs the country, NOT the Prime Minister. Mickey Mouse can be Prime Minister, and it doesn’t matter a tinkers curse because decisions are made by ministers in their portfolios, and these decisions are ratified by a caucus. The majority of those Ministers in the Labor Party are former Union identities. Most of these have little or NO training in the disciplines needed to make intelligent decisions. Some of these former union members were straight out union thugs of the worst kind. What Government appoints a third rate rock identity as environment minister?. I’m just as green as Peter Garret – make me a minister please, I need the money. If you want change you have to get rid of the incompetent boobs that REALLY run the country – Voting by the popularity of the figure head is plain stupid. The Labor party will not have the guts to get rid of idiot ministers like Garret and Penny Wong.
Insulation Stuffup.
A third rate fitter could have seen this coming and $4 could have avoided the whole scenario of deaths by electrocution [ No Sh*t – 2 steel press studs and an earth wire to the nearest ground – live ceiling – ‘BANG” blown breaker at the switch board, saving lives]
So a life isn’t worth $4 and 4 minutes time ???
And that’s just one glaring example.
You have to have ministers who have at least a working knowledge of the expertise needed in their portfolios. EG- Master electrician for energy or better yet, a former power station engineer. As long as labor keeps these idiots in charge of things they know diddley squat about, you will continue to pay for their stuff ups [ and pay dearly by your taxes ]. Dick Smith is suing the government for billions lost in aviation buy stuff ups.
The Prime Minister can have the Charisma of JC but in the end, the hands are cuffed if the party majority sez ‘OK’ to stupid decisions.
Your not convinced ? go to the NET and google ‘7 torpedoes’ by professor Bob Carter and WATCH IT !!!. now tell me that ‘carbon trading’ will make any change in the climate. Try emptying the ocean with a bucket. A grand money making scam of the first order, and the sad thing is, you all fell for it.
Tony may not be the worlds most charismatic PM [ and he’s not a women – last time I checked ] but at least you get a brand new set of ministers who might [ I say, just might ] make decisions that actually WORK.
That’s a pretty fair estimate by anyone’s standards. Remember, you DON’T get WHAT you vote for in Australian elections; you get WHO you vote for. If WHO you vote for, doesn’t get you WHAT you vote for, that’s on YOUR head.
NOW GO AND VOTE FOR ‘WHAT’ YOU WANT
Monday, July 19, 2010
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Oil spill fiasco
The Big Squirt Fiasco
For a supposedly smart nation – the good ol’ US of A has some pretty stupid engineers RE: the massive oil blow out 1.5 Kilometers under the sea, in the Gulf of Mexico. Did you all cop an eyeful of the bullsh*t complicated scrap metal yard they have over the well head?. Now I know what I’m talking about because someone very, very close to me, is an oil man. A master engineer, no less. I followed the exploits of oil trouble shooters in the sixties [ Red Adair for one ] and while this deep well presents problems because of pressure, it certainly is not un-solvable if these wankers would stop trying to reinvent the wheel and think outside of the box [ As well as look to the past methodologies ].
The idea now is to plug the well, not valve it because things are now way out of hand. To do this, you have to get rid of all that surrounding crap so that you have just the well head [ which is internally sleeved by the original drill pipe].
There are at least two methods to plug this sucker without pouring thousands of tons concrete into it. To refresh you old oil men [ are there any left?] – we can use explosives safely only because fire don’t burn under water.
Method one: This uses the ‘string of beads’ valve. First you get a pipe that can slip inside the well pipe. The pipe is open at both ends but the top end has a valve on it. Around the valve is a massive donut with sufficient weight to sink the pipe into the well pipe. The valve is left open to allow oil to flow out of it else the pressure would push THIS pipe out of the well head no matter what weight you have on it. The key to this method is this. In various places down your valve pipe, you place circular flat pack explosives [ like a string of beads or in this case – mini donuts]. When the valve pipe is in place, you detonate the explosives so that the valve casing pipe is bulged out to form multi corks. The top valve is still left open because you don’t want to blow the crap out of your new valve on detonation, and you certainly don’t want to fire the valve pipe out of the well head like a bullet. At this latter point we can be hopeful of several things. Firstly, the valve sleeve pipe is now jammed against the well head pipe in multiple places. Next we slowly shut the mother down. Problem solved .
The second method is one many don’t favor because it’s a bit iffy. You get a second drill head BIGGER than the original and grind it down over the original head pipe. This takes longer and there is a risk of causing a bigger blow out than you already have. If successful, you can now use an oversize valve on your new well pipe.
I can’t believe these retards haven’t tried these methods but then again!!!.
For a supposedly smart nation – the good ol’ US of A has some pretty stupid engineers RE: the massive oil blow out 1.5 Kilometers under the sea, in the Gulf of Mexico. Did you all cop an eyeful of the bullsh*t complicated scrap metal yard they have over the well head?. Now I know what I’m talking about because someone very, very close to me, is an oil man. A master engineer, no less. I followed the exploits of oil trouble shooters in the sixties [ Red Adair for one ] and while this deep well presents problems because of pressure, it certainly is not un-solvable if these wankers would stop trying to reinvent the wheel and think outside of the box [ As well as look to the past methodologies ].
The idea now is to plug the well, not valve it because things are now way out of hand. To do this, you have to get rid of all that surrounding crap so that you have just the well head [ which is internally sleeved by the original drill pipe].
There are at least two methods to plug this sucker without pouring thousands of tons concrete into it. To refresh you old oil men [ are there any left?] – we can use explosives safely only because fire don’t burn under water.
Method one: This uses the ‘string of beads’ valve. First you get a pipe that can slip inside the well pipe. The pipe is open at both ends but the top end has a valve on it. Around the valve is a massive donut with sufficient weight to sink the pipe into the well pipe. The valve is left open to allow oil to flow out of it else the pressure would push THIS pipe out of the well head no matter what weight you have on it. The key to this method is this. In various places down your valve pipe, you place circular flat pack explosives [ like a string of beads or in this case – mini donuts]. When the valve pipe is in place, you detonate the explosives so that the valve casing pipe is bulged out to form multi corks. The top valve is still left open because you don’t want to blow the crap out of your new valve on detonation, and you certainly don’t want to fire the valve pipe out of the well head like a bullet. At this latter point we can be hopeful of several things. Firstly, the valve sleeve pipe is now jammed against the well head pipe in multiple places. Next we slowly shut the mother down. Problem solved .
The second method is one many don’t favor because it’s a bit iffy. You get a second drill head BIGGER than the original and grind it down over the original head pipe. This takes longer and there is a risk of causing a bigger blow out than you already have. If successful, you can now use an oversize valve on your new well pipe.
I can’t believe these retards haven’t tried these methods but then again!!!.
chinese crap
I never pay more than $30 for a pair of casual shoes and I usually buy them for work anyway. I saw a bargain in shoes on the stand ’buy one pair get a second pair free’ WOW! Can’t go wrong. So I bought 2 pair at $29:95, one pair black, one pair brown. I didn’t need to wear them straight away so I put them in the wardrobe till my old pair wore out. 2 Months later, I pulled them out and discovered the ‘color’ was cheap dipped resin type plastic and was peeling off in chunks. I was going to throw them out when, on closer examination, I discovered the shoe was actually made of pure Suede
Apparently, our cheap Chinese shoe manufacturer thought it was cheaper still to plastic dip the shoes for color rather than dye the ‘leather’. After scraping off all the plastic color, I now have a very expensive pair of Grey Suede shoes. What morons. Not bad for 30 bucks – 2 pair of pure Suede shoes even if they are Grey.
Apparently, our cheap Chinese shoe manufacturer thought it was cheaper still to plastic dip the shoes for color rather than dye the ‘leather’. After scraping off all the plastic color, I now have a very expensive pair of Grey Suede shoes. What morons. Not bad for 30 bucks – 2 pair of pure Suede shoes even if they are Grey.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Road Rage Wanker GGH-60 white ute
We’ve all heard the stories [and evidence by statistics] of people driving utes who think they are immune from road rules well I just had a confrontation with one of these wankers in a car park area no less. A white ute rego GGH-60 . [ Watch out for this idiot in your travels]. So I’m cruising for a parking spot in a car park that is literally bumper to bumper. I signal to make a right turn at a ‘T’ junction and just make the turn when; a ute pulls out of a car space on my right to go in the opposite direction and faces me nose to nose. Remember, I am on the correct side of the road with my arse barely clearing the junction. I can’t see squat behind me and if I attempt to reverse INTO the junction stream AND someone hits my arse – I haven’t got a leg to stand on legally. On the other hand, mister wanker only has to reverse a few feet [ no one behind him at all ] then clear my car so that HE is now on the correct side of the road. A no brainer is it not ?. Do you think this sh*t for brains is going to reverse ? No siree Bob; in fact he edges forward in an attempt to FORCE me to commit to a bloody dangerous maneuver and reverse. I follow the best course of action – point to the junction behind me and throw up my hands in exclamation. This wanker just sits there, his nose 2 inches from my nose. I fold my hands, turn off the engine and stare at him for a full 3 minutes until he finally concedes and reverses all of 2 feet in order to clear my car. The final insult – as he is passing my car he exclaims “don’t you worry you c**t, I got your number and I’ll get you on the road”
This is the sort of people in a car park who toss all road rules out the window.
This is the sort of people in a car park who toss all road rules out the window.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Climate change fiasco
Check this out- MP3 AUDIO . Greg Combet [Minister Assisting Penny Wong] makes a total boob of himself by 1. changing the questions, 2. Not knowing answers he's PAID to know 3. Insists it's all about 'Carbon Pollution' and not CO2 causing climate change. 4. Uses every words like 'opinion' - 'consensus' EXCEPT 'empirical data' which he avoids like the plague... but have a listen for yourself. This arse hole is assisting Penny Wong ? I'm not surprised because you would not want a scientist assisting her.
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Ooops! someone finally stumbled on solar solution
I really thought I would live long enough to see what I just read in a blog the other day. With all the collusion and lies and threat of world government by who-ever; cheap energy seemed to be the answer. As we all would have guessed, this was never going to happen because of suppression of information to keep the coal fires burning. It was inevitable that SOMEONE would discover a really cheap and easy way of making a DIY solar panel from ordinary household products. Admittedly, not as efficient as commercial ones [ 62% ] but less than [ estimated by price ] $400 / kilowatt from the materials used. I will NOT give out the blog site or his name since I cannot verify his methodology until I actually make one myself but I can tell you all, it involves the use of Aluminum foil and clear plastic [ glad wrap ]and he resides in Europe. He claims to have made a 25KW set of panels and is now 'off the grid forever' The only additional expense [ he sez ] are stationary batteries and inverter for night time consumption. Well I already know this is a mandatory requirement anyway to have electricity 24 hours of the day. I have the ingredient list [ all can be purchased from your local food and hardware store ].
When I have made a small model [ about 1 x 1 meter panel ] I will report on the results. If favorable, I will give detailed instructions HERE so you all can build one. If this is a success, the solar panel industry will collapse as soon as the exponential release gets going. So far [ as far as I am aware from his blog ] hundreds of 'subscribers' are even now building a test panel. Wonder what the thought police will do ?. Too late guys, like PGP, its release will be unstopable.
When I have made a small model [ about 1 x 1 meter panel ] I will report on the results. If favorable, I will give detailed instructions HERE so you all can build one. If this is a success, the solar panel industry will collapse as soon as the exponential release gets going. So far [ as far as I am aware from his blog ] hundreds of 'subscribers' are even now building a test panel. Wonder what the thought police will do ?. Too late guys, like PGP, its release will be unstopable.
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
LUCKY I'M NOT WITH A.A.M.I. ???
‘LUCKY-EEEEE I’M NOT WITH A.A.M.I.’
Remember my little talk on ‘extrinsic / intrinsic fraud [ refer to products talk in this blog ]
Seems even the big boys ignore the warning signs. Now you are lucky if your with A.A.M.I. B U T ONLY if your ‘with’ them.
“We have seen the enemy, and the enemy is US’
God help you all if you are NOT with A.A.M.I. AND you have a claim against them through absolutely no fault of your own. Seems that if you have the sheer sh*t arse gall to be in an accident [ booted up the rear by another car while stationary at traffic lights ]; you will get less than a fair go from A.A.M.I
Happened to me in Brisbane. The other driver was insured with above. ‘ No worries’ sayeth A.A.M.I. rep SHENAID ‘Not only will we have your car repaired but you can hire a car and the bill is on us.
YOU LITTLE BEAUTY! WOW! THAT’S SERVICE.
Of course there’s a catch; otherwise, what’s the point of this blog. They said over the phone [ nothing in writing ] they would pay for ‘Fair and reasonable costs’ in hiring a car – nothing [ and I mean, NOTHING ] else was said. They also stated that THEY have a preferred company – what’s more ‘Here is a special priority number to quote from us, so that you get a car immediately’
And again ‘YOU BEAUTY! WOW! THAT’S SERVICE.
So I went to Hertz, quoted the number, got a car on the spot. At the end of the period [10 days to fix my car], I returned the car submitted the bill to A.A.M.I. AND RECEIVED A CHEQUE FOR LESS THAN WHAT IT COST ME TO HIRE THE CAR.
Uh!, what you talk about, Willis ?
Quote from A.A.M.I. rep SHENAID ‘ It’s our policy NOT to pay for full insurance cover when you hire a car, so that component has been removed ‘. WITHOUT full cover, I would have been responsible for ANY damage occurring to the hire car from ANY cause, leaving me $700 out of pocket in excess insurance cover [ standard ].
Oh I see….. So if I am unlucky enough to have a claim on A.A.M.I. and I am not myself a client. I automatically have to pay for full insurance cover on the hire car to avoid jeopardy which I never would have had to avoid because I’m covered in MY car by MY insurance cover [ which I still have to pay for while my car is in the shop ].
Several points here [ which I argued with SHENAID to no avail ]. In my mind this is NOT fair and reasonable as – ‘why should I have bare a risk value simply because I was hit by your client ?’. I had no real choice as to where I could hire the car, nor any choice as to car type [ what if they only had a Rolls Royce available ?]. I was NOT told of exclusions to their statement [ Extrinsic fraud ]. I had a contract with them and they changed the rules after the contract was completed. The whole scenario is based on their verbal statement that they would pay for ‘FAIR AND REASONABLE’ hire [rates]. Not by any stretch of the imagination is putting ME at risk, fair and reasonable.. But the fact that they did not inform me as to conditions, is in itself, a more serious breach of law. At worst, I could have made an informed decision as to whether I would risk a standard hire or pay for the extra out of MY pocket. SHENAID virtually verbal led me into believing that I had no choice in the matter of car hire.
I sent them a letter of demand which prompted the reply by SHENAID STILL refusing to pay up, citing their own policy [ this isn’t worth a pinch of sh*t – in law ]. So now it’s to the small claims court and although I have been told by all and GOD himself that I am in the right on all counts; judging from the corrupt practices of some magistrates; I would be less than totally surprised if the decision was in their favor. You work out why this would be so; but it’s a no brainer. Should it go against me – it’s sign on the back window treatment just like others who think they can do what they bloody well like and even worse; think no one is going to do anything about it. I got news for you A.A.M.I.
Since I write for 3 web sites AND have my house and contents insured with them; I am considering going with another company when the policy is due. I ask myself ‘ Do they think it’s really worth $266:00 when I can effectively loose them thousands in lost business – mine and everyone else I tell this story too – ????’
If you are with A.A.M.I. good be upon you, but I sincerely loath their perpetrated practices on other people who have the sh*t arse gall to NOT be insured with them.
EDITED LATER:
I have decided NOT to pursue legal options. Why the hell should I spend time and money trying to educate the ignorant when they just won't listen to reason ?
Just like this global warming world SCAM, I don't take kindly to be treated like a moron - so my now option is make up some signs [ just like before ] stating that AAMI screwed me good and proper. Lets just see how long it takes THIS TIME to thump the message into their pee brains that BAD advertising will cost them dearly and isn't worth screwing me out of $266 when they can loose potentially, multi thousands of dollars in business. Some companies just won't learn.
EDITED MUCH LATER:
Well it seems AAMI haven't got the hint yet but so far [25/06/2010] I have had 57 people ask me what it's all about. 21 were thinking of switching to AAMI but now have assured me that they are NOT!. 12 people are dumping AAMI as their present insurer and going with someone else. And the rest are thinking about it. Thats 33 people who would have paid about $400 each .. lets see that's $13,200 bucks that AAMI wont see.
Now for the coup-de-grase . GO TO - http://unluckyurwithaami.com/ can I pick 'um or can I pick 'um ????
EDITED 15 SEPT 2010
Well today I removed the signs from my car - no! I did not get my money back but I figured I have cost AAMI car insurance about $38,700 in premiums they will NEVER see because of the list of people I have whom I have related this story to.
Yep!, I kept a list of everyone who will NOT be insuring / re-insuring with AAMI and that's not counting the people who are umming and Ahhing about it. CONGRATULATIONS
SHENAID - SINGLE HANDEDLY YOU HAVE COST YOUR EMPLOYER $38,700 ALL OVER $266 YOU WOULDN'T GIVE BACK. I feel better already.
Remember my little talk on ‘extrinsic / intrinsic fraud [ refer to products talk in this blog ]
Seems even the big boys ignore the warning signs. Now you are lucky if your with A.A.M.I. B U T ONLY if your ‘with’ them.
“We have seen the enemy, and the enemy is US’
God help you all if you are NOT with A.A.M.I. AND you have a claim against them through absolutely no fault of your own. Seems that if you have the sheer sh*t arse gall to be in an accident [ booted up the rear by another car while stationary at traffic lights ]; you will get less than a fair go from A.A.M.I
Happened to me in Brisbane. The other driver was insured with above. ‘ No worries’ sayeth A.A.M.I. rep SHENAID ‘Not only will we have your car repaired but you can hire a car and the bill is on us.
YOU LITTLE BEAUTY! WOW! THAT’S SERVICE.
Of course there’s a catch; otherwise, what’s the point of this blog. They said over the phone [ nothing in writing ] they would pay for ‘Fair and reasonable costs’ in hiring a car – nothing [ and I mean, NOTHING ] else was said. They also stated that THEY have a preferred company – what’s more ‘Here is a special priority number to quote from us, so that you get a car immediately’
And again ‘YOU BEAUTY! WOW! THAT’S SERVICE.
So I went to Hertz, quoted the number, got a car on the spot. At the end of the period [10 days to fix my car], I returned the car submitted the bill to A.A.M.I. AND RECEIVED A CHEQUE FOR LESS THAN WHAT IT COST ME TO HIRE THE CAR.
Uh!, what you talk about, Willis ?
Quote from A.A.M.I. rep SHENAID ‘ It’s our policy NOT to pay for full insurance cover when you hire a car, so that component has been removed ‘. WITHOUT full cover, I would have been responsible for ANY damage occurring to the hire car from ANY cause, leaving me $700 out of pocket in excess insurance cover [ standard ].
Oh I see….. So if I am unlucky enough to have a claim on A.A.M.I. and I am not myself a client. I automatically have to pay for full insurance cover on the hire car to avoid jeopardy which I never would have had to avoid because I’m covered in MY car by MY insurance cover [ which I still have to pay for while my car is in the shop ].
Several points here [ which I argued with SHENAID to no avail ]. In my mind this is NOT fair and reasonable as – ‘why should I have bare a risk value simply because I was hit by your client ?’. I had no real choice as to where I could hire the car, nor any choice as to car type [ what if they only had a Rolls Royce available ?]. I was NOT told of exclusions to their statement [ Extrinsic fraud ]. I had a contract with them and they changed the rules after the contract was completed. The whole scenario is based on their verbal statement that they would pay for ‘FAIR AND REASONABLE’ hire [rates]. Not by any stretch of the imagination is putting ME at risk, fair and reasonable.. But the fact that they did not inform me as to conditions, is in itself, a more serious breach of law. At worst, I could have made an informed decision as to whether I would risk a standard hire or pay for the extra out of MY pocket. SHENAID virtually verbal led me into believing that I had no choice in the matter of car hire.
I sent them a letter of demand which prompted the reply by SHENAID STILL refusing to pay up, citing their own policy [ this isn’t worth a pinch of sh*t – in law ]. So now it’s to the small claims court and although I have been told by all and GOD himself that I am in the right on all counts; judging from the corrupt practices of some magistrates; I would be less than totally surprised if the decision was in their favor. You work out why this would be so; but it’s a no brainer. Should it go against me – it’s sign on the back window treatment just like others who think they can do what they bloody well like and even worse; think no one is going to do anything about it. I got news for you A.A.M.I.
Since I write for 3 web sites AND have my house and contents insured with them; I am considering going with another company when the policy is due. I ask myself ‘ Do they think it’s really worth $266:00 when I can effectively loose them thousands in lost business – mine and everyone else I tell this story too – ????’
If you are with A.A.M.I. good be upon you, but I sincerely loath their perpetrated practices on other people who have the sh*t arse gall to NOT be insured with them.
EDITED LATER:
I have decided NOT to pursue legal options. Why the hell should I spend time and money trying to educate the ignorant when they just won't listen to reason ?
Just like this global warming world SCAM, I don't take kindly to be treated like a moron - so my now option is make up some signs [ just like before ] stating that AAMI screwed me good and proper. Lets just see how long it takes THIS TIME to thump the message into their pee brains that BAD advertising will cost them dearly and isn't worth screwing me out of $266 when they can loose potentially, multi thousands of dollars in business. Some companies just won't learn.
EDITED MUCH LATER:
Well it seems AAMI haven't got the hint yet but so far [25/06/2010] I have had 57 people ask me what it's all about. 21 were thinking of switching to AAMI but now have assured me that they are NOT!. 12 people are dumping AAMI as their present insurer and going with someone else. And the rest are thinking about it. Thats 33 people who would have paid about $400 each .. lets see that's $13,200 bucks that AAMI wont see.
Now for the coup-de-grase . GO TO - http://unluckyurwithaami.com/ can I pick 'um or can I pick 'um ????
EDITED 15 SEPT 2010
Well today I removed the signs from my car - no! I did not get my money back but I figured I have cost AAMI car insurance about $38,700 in premiums they will NEVER see because of the list of people I have whom I have related this story to.
Yep!, I kept a list of everyone who will NOT be insuring / re-insuring with AAMI and that's not counting the people who are umming and Ahhing about it. CONGRATULATIONS
SHENAID - SINGLE HANDEDLY YOU HAVE COST YOUR EMPLOYER $38,700 ALL OVER $266 YOU WOULDN'T GIVE BACK. I feel better already.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
